What is the difference between distributive negotiation and integrative negotiation

Distributive Negotiation is the negotiation strategy in which fixed amount of resources are divided between the parties. Integrative Negotiation is a type of negotiation in which mutual problem solving technique is used to enlarge the assets, that are to be divided between parties.

What is distributive negotiation?

Distributive negotiation involves haggling over a fixed amount of value—that is, slicing up the pie. In a distributive negotiation, there is likely only one issue at stake, typically price. … By comparison, in integrative bargaining, more than one issue is available to be negotiated.

What is distributive and integrative bargaining?

Distributive bargaining, according to the University of Colorado Boulder, is the approach to bargaining (or negotiation) that is used when the parties are trying to divide something up or distribute something. It contrasts with integrative bargaining in which the parties are trying to make more of something.

What is integrative negotiation?

Integrative bargaining (also called “interest-based bargaining,” “win-win bargaining”) is a negotiation strategy in which parties collaborate to find a “win-win” solution to their dispute. This strategy focuses on developing mutually beneficial agreements based on the interests of the disputants.

What is an example of distributive negotiation?

Buying a car is a classic example of distributive bargaining. A car sale involves two disparate parties: a buyer and a seller. In this case, each person has different interests: while the seller wants to make as much money as possible, the buyer seeks to pay the least amount of money possible.

What is the importance of distributive negotiation?

Distributive bargaining is important because there are some disputes that cannot be solved in any other way — they are inherently zero-sum. If the stakes are high, such conflicts can be very resistant to resolution.

Are salary negotiations distributive or integrative?

For example, you might use integrative or interest-based bargaining when negotiating several aspects of a job – salary, benefits, time off, or even start date. By contrast, distributive negotiation involves one fixed point, and the assumption that both parties want to divvy up the pie in the best manner possible.

What are distributive issues?

Distributive issues are also known as fixed-pie issues, because they’re like a pie whose size is fixed (it can’t be made bigger or smaller) that two or more people have to split. These are the ones where there really is one thing that both parties want, and that thing has to be divided.

What is an example of integrative negotiation?

The classic example involves two teenagers and an orange. If there’s only one orange in the refrigerator and both teenagers demand it simultaneously, a distributive bargain might well involve each of them getting half of it. … The integrative bargain is obviously better for both.

What are the main features of integrative negotiation?

Characteristics of Integrative Negotiators.
Honesty and integrity. Interest-based negotiating requires a certain level of trust between the parties. …
Abundance mentality. …
Maturity. …
Systems orientation. …
Superior listening skills.

Article first time published on

What is integrative negotiation PDF?

• INTEGRATIVE IS A NEGOTIATION STRATEGY IN WHICH PARTIES COLLABORATE TO FIND. A “WIN-WIN” SOLUTION TO THEIR DISPUTE. • FOCUSES ON DEVELOPING MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL AGREEMENTS BASED ON THE. INTERESTS OF THE DISPUTANTS. • INTERESTS INCLUDE THE NEEDS, DESIRES, CONCERNS, AND FEARS IMPORTANT TO.

What is Zopa in negotiation?

A zone of possible agreement (ZOPA) is a bargaining range in an area where two or more negotiating parties may find common ground.

What are the characteristics of distributive negotiation?

In general, one party asks for much higher benefits than it is willing to accept and the other party offers much less than it is willing to give. Then by negotiation and compromise, they meet somewhere in the middle and both parties are happy.

When should you use integrative negotiation?

Integrative negotiation is possible when the parties have some shared interests or opportunities to realize mutual gains through trades across multiple issues. In integrative negotiation, more than one issue is available to be negotiated.

What are the types of negotiators?

There are many different types of people in this world, but there are only three types of negotiators: Analysts, Accommodators, and Assertives. The best negotiators incorporate characteristics of all three types into their strategy and know how to shift their communication style to better fit their counterpart.

What is the difference between distributive and integrated bargaining and how does integrative bargaining create a win/win solution in negotiation settings?

Distributive bargaining is often filled with conflict, because both parties maintain an intractable position in their attempt to lose less than the other side. Integrative bargaining is typically less fraught with tension, as both sides enter the negotiation with the willingness to compromise to achieve a consensus.

Why is integrative negotiation important?

As integrative negotiation reduces conflicts in the process of reaching an agreement, using it can improve the relationship between negotiators. Basically, at the successful conclusion of a negotiation, decision-makers feel that their interests and objectives were addressed by their peers.

Why is integrative bargaining preferable to distributive bargaining?

In general, integrative negotiation is preferable to distributive because integrative builds long-term relationships and facilitates working together in the future. It allows each negotiator to leave the bargaining table feeling they have achieved a victory.

What is distributive strategy?

Definition: Distributive bargaining is a competitive bargaining strategy in which one party gains only if the other party loses something. It is used as a negotiation strategy to distribute fixed resources such as money, resources, assets, etc. between both the parties.

How do you deal with distributive negotiation?

Focus on the Other Party’s BATNA and Reservation Value. …
Avoid Making Unilateral Concessions. …
Be Comfortable with Silence. …
Label Your Concessions. …
Make Contingent Concessions.

What are some factors that facilitate a successful integrative negotiation?

(1) the presence of a common goal, (2) faith in one’s own problem-solving ability, (3) a belief in the validity of the other party’s position, (4) the motivation and commitment to work together, (5) trust, (6) clear and accurate communication, and (7) an understanding of the dynamics of integrative negotiation.

What is intra organizational bargaining?

Intraorganizational bargaining: Takes place largely away from the bargaining table and refers to the internal negotiations that occur within the respective organizations. Each side must resolve some of these internal conflicts before it can reach a settlement with its bargaining opponent.

How do you prepare for Integrative negotiation?

Expand and Modify the Resource Pie. Add resources in such a way that both sides can achieve their objectives.
Use Nonspecific Compensation. …
Cut the Costs for Compliance. …
Find a Bridge Solution. …
Super-ordination. …
Compromise. …
Brainstorm. …
Take Surveys.

What is expanding the pie?

‘Expanding the Pie’ comes from the metaphor where people are negotiating about a single pie, such that where one person gets more of the pie it is clear that the other person gets less. If both parties work together to get a bigger pie, then both can have more with the same percentage division.

What is difference between bargaining and negotiation?

Bargaining is about focusing on who is right. It is competitive and win-lose. Negotiation is about focusing on what is right. It is cooperative and win-win.

What is the ZOPA range?

The Zone of Possible Agreement, or ZOPA, is the range in a negotiation in which two or more parties can find common ground. Here, the negotiating parties can work toward a common goal and reach a potential agreement that incorporates at least some of the other’s ideas.

What is RV in negotiation?

“Reservation Value” is the least favorable point at which one will accept a negotiated agreement. For example, for a seller, this means the minimum amount they would be prepared to accept, while for a buyer it would mean the maximum that they would be prepared to pay. … For example, imagine you are selling your car.

What do BATNA and ZOPA stand for?

BATNA and ZOPA. Your BATNA is your Best Alternative To Negotiated Agreement. Your ZOPA is your Zone of Possible Agreement. … The BATNA is what to do when you do not reach a deal and ideally minimizes your losses; any offer that is less than your BATNA should be refused.